Delhi Police said a bomb threat targeting a High Court was a hoax call. Officials stated that they checked the court premises as per the Standard operating procedure and “found it to be a hoax till now.” The clarification underscored procedural verification before characterising the threat.
Police term threat a hoax
Authorities said the alert concerning a High Court was assessed and categorised as a hoax call. The characterisation followed a verification by Delhi Police, who asserted that their assessment was grounded in procedural checks and onsite scrutiny. By describing the threat as a hoax, the police indicated that the information communicated via the call did not align with what was observed during their inspection. The statement emphasised that the determination rests on present findings and reflects a cautious, step-by-step approach to evaluating such claims. The police characterisation aims to provide clarity to the public while setting out the current position that the reported danger has not been substantiated by evidence observed at the court premises.
Court premises checked under SOP
Officials said the court premises were checked “as per the Standard operating procedure,” signalling adherence to established methods for handling such alerts. By referencing the Standard operating procedure, the police highlighted a structured approach involving systematic inspection and documentation, ensuring that any conclusion is based on methodical checks. This emphasis on procedure strengthens the credibility of the verification and conveys that due diligence was applied throughout. It also signals that the evaluation was neither ad hoc nor cursory, but aligned to the formal framework used in such circumstances. The explicit mention of a Standard operating procedure communicates that institutional protocols guided the response from the outset of the call to the subsequent onsite checks.
‘Till now’ qualifier signals continued care
The police said they “found it to be a hoax till now,” a phrasing that leaves room for continued vigilance while communicating the present assessment. The qualifier “till now” indicates that officials are keeping the situation under observation and that the conclusion is based on the latest checks completed at the time of the statement. This careful language balances reassurance with prudence, acknowledging that assessments are contingent on ongoing verification. It also reflects an understanding that public communication in such situations must be precise and time-bound, signalling that subsequent updates would depend on any new inputs or observations. By framing the status in these terms, the police have provided clarity without foreclosing further review.
Communication and reassurance
The assertion that the threat was a hoax call, together with confirmation that the court premises were checked as per the Standard operating procedure, serves to reassure stakeholders that due processes were followed. The clarity of the message addresses immediate concerns while avoiding speculation beyond the facts available. By publicly sharing the current status, officials have sought to maintain calm and transparency, indicating that their findings are anchored in procedural verification. The communication also underscores that the assessment is based on what has been observed “till now,” keeping expectations aligned with an evolving review. In focusing on process and present findings, the police messaging aims to steady the environment around the court premises and to affirm that an orderly response is underway.